← All Pathways
Quick Reference

Key Frameworks

The essential mental models, methodologies, and frameworks used across all four learning pathways. Bookmark this page as your go-to reference guide.

Prompt EngineeringAI FluencyDesign ThinkingSystems ThinkingChange ManagementAI ArchitectureHuman-Centred AI
Prompt Engineering Beginner Pathway

COSTAR

Context · Objective · Style · Tone · Audience · Response

01

COSTAR is a universal framework for structuring AI prompts, developed by Sheila Teo. Rather than typing a vague request, you systematically define the Context (background and situation), Objective (the specific task), Style (formal, analytical, persuasive), Tone (confident, empathetic, urgent), Audience (who will read the output), and Response format (table, bullets, essay, JSON). Studies show COSTAR-structured prompts improve first-pass output quality by 2.6× compared to unstructured requests, reducing rework and iteration cycles.

Key Points

C — Context: background, situation, and relevant constraints
O — Objective: the specific task or goal for the AI
S — Style: writing approach (formal, analytical, persuasive)
T — Tone: emotional register (confident, empathetic, urgent)
A — Audience: who will consume the output and their expertise level
R — Response: desired format (table, bullets, JSON, specific length)
"The quality of your output is determined before you hit 'send' — invest 2 minutes in the brief, save 30 minutes in rework."

4D Framework

Delegate · Describe · Discern · Deploy

02

The 4D Framework provides a universal model for human-AI collaboration, structuring every AI interaction across four stages. Delegate means identifying which tasks are genuinely high-value for AI augmentation versus those requiring human judgment, relationships, or accountability. Describe means communicating your task with precision using COSTAR and context engineering. Discern means critically evaluating every AI output — never accepting the first response without systematic verification. Deploy means taking full professional responsibility for AI-assisted work, applying data governance and disclosure requirements.

Key Points

Delegate: use the AI Delegation Matrix to identify high-value tasks
Delegate: 5 categories — Routine, Research, Creative, Analysis, Communication
Describe: apply COSTAR + context engineering for precision
Discern: use SIFT to verify every output before accepting
Deploy: apply Green/Amber/Red data classification
Deploy: disclose AI use when required by policy or ethics
"Fluency is not about using AI more — it's about using AI better, with full ownership of the output."
Critical Evaluation Beginner Pathway

SIFT

Stop · Investigate · Find · Trace

03

SIFT is a lateral reading framework adapted for AI output verification. When you receive an AI response, Stop before acting on it — resist the pull to accept polished-sounding text at face value. Investigate the source of any claim by checking whether the AI has cited real, verifiable sources. Find better coverage by searching for the claim independently rather than relying solely on the AI's version. Trace any quotes, statistics, or references back to their original context to confirm they haven't been misrepresented. 74% of leaders cite inaccuracy as their top AI risk — SIFT is the systematic antidote.

Key Points

S — Stop: pause before acting on AI output, resist automation bias
I — Investigate the source: are citations real and verifiable?
F — Find better coverage: search independently for the claim
T — Trace claims: verify quotes and statistics in original context
Apply the Confidence-Consequence Matrix for risk-based verification
High-consequence outputs always require independent verification
"LLMs do not 'know' facts — they predict statistically likely text. This is why outputs can be confidently wrong."
Design Thinking Designer Pathway

Double Diamond

Discover · Define · Develop · Deliver

04

The Double Diamond is a design thinking framework developed by the UK Design Council, structured as two diverge-converge cycles. The first diamond opens with Discover (broad user research, empathy, and opportunity mapping) and closes with Define (synthesising insights into a sharp problem statement). The second diamond opens with Develop (ideation, prototyping, and creative exploration) and closes with Deliver (testing, iteration, and launch). Applied to AI product design, the framework ensures you solve the right problem before building the right solution — preventing the common failure of building technically impressive AI that nobody needs.

Key Points

Diamond 1 — Discover: user research, pain point mapping, AI opportunity identification
Diamond 1 — Define: 'How Might We' statements, problem framing, use case prioritisation
Diamond 2 — Develop: ideation with AI, rapid prototyping, storyboarding AI interactions
Diamond 2 — Deliver: usability testing, trust measurement, iteration and launch
Responsible AI design: bias identification and transparency by design
Anti-pattern: building AI solutions before defining the human problem
"The most common AI design failure is building technically impressive solutions to the wrong problem."
Strategic Analysis Builder Pathway

Systems Thinking

Stocks · Flows · Feedback Loops · Leverage Points

05

Systems Thinking is a discipline for understanding how components of a system interrelate and how systems work over time. Applied to AI, it reveals why optimising one part of an organisation (e.g., automating a workflow) can degrade the whole (e.g., creating bottlenecks elsewhere or eroding skills). Key concepts include reinforcing loops (where AI success breeds more AI investment, accelerating capability), balancing loops (where resistance or governance slows adoption), and leverage points (the places in a system where a small change produces large effects). The Iceberg Model reminds leaders that visible AI events sit above deeper patterns, structures, and mental models that must be addressed for lasting transformation.

Key Points

Stocks and flows: what accumulates (capability, trust) and what moves it
Reinforcing loops: AI success → investment → more capability → more success
Balancing loops: resistance, governance, and risk management as stabilisers
Leverage points: intervene at structure and mental models, not just events
Iceberg Model: events → patterns → structures → mental models
Second-order effects: automation decisions ripple across the whole system
"You cannot understand a system by analysing its parts in isolation — the behaviour emerges from the relationships between them."
Change Management Architect Pathway

ADKAR

Awareness · Desire · Knowledge · Ability · Reinforcement

06

ADKAR is a goal-oriented change management model developed by Prosci, describing the five building blocks required for an individual to successfully change. Applied to AI transformation: Awareness means ensuring people understand why AI adoption is necessary and what happens without it. Desire means addressing the 'what's in it for me' question and building genuine motivation to change. Knowledge means providing the training and frameworks people need to use AI effectively. Ability means giving people practice time, coaching, and safe environments to build real competence. Reinforcement means celebrating wins, measuring progress, and sustaining the change so people don't revert to old behaviours.

Key Points

A — Awareness: why change is needed and the risk of not changing
D — Desire: personal motivation and 'what's in it for me'
K — Knowledge: training, frameworks, and how to change
A — Ability: practice, coaching, and building real competence
R — Reinforcement: celebrating wins, measuring, sustaining change
ADKAR is sequential: gaps at any stage block the stages that follow
"People adopt new behaviours from peers they trust, not from mandates they receive. Champions make AI feel safe to try."
Advanced AI Builder Pathway

Context Engineering

Relevance · Recency · Structure · Boundaries

07

Context engineering is the emerging discipline of designing the information environment for AI — structuring all available information (documents, data, instructions, and constraints) to maximise AI performance on a specific task. While prompt engineering focuses on the single message you send, context engineering encompasses the entire information architecture: which documents to include, how to chunk and index them, what system instructions to set, and how to manage the context window. The four principles are Relevance (include only what matters — noise dilutes signal), Recency (prioritise fresh data to bridge knowledge cutoffs), Structure (organise information logically with headers and labels), and Boundaries (define scope explicitly — tell AI what is in and out of scope).

Key Points

R — Relevance: include only what matters for this specific task
R — Recency: prioritise fresh data; bridge AI knowledge cutoffs
S — Structure: organise with headers, sections, and clear labels
B — Boundaries: define scope explicitly — in and out of scope
Beyond prompting: document selection, data prep, system instructions
Common mistake: dumping entire documents without curation
"Context engineering is structuring all available information to maximise AI performance — it's the difference between a confused intern and a briefed expert."
AI Architecture Builder Pathway

RAG

Retrieve · Augment · Generate

08

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an AI architecture pattern that grounds language model responses in your organisation's specific, up-to-date knowledge. Rather than relying solely on the model's training data (which has a knowledge cutoff and contains no proprietary information), RAG first retrieves relevant documents from a vector database using semantic search, then augments the model's prompt with those retrieved passages, and finally generates a response grounded in that retrieved context. This dramatically reduces hallucination, keeps responses current, and allows AI to work with confidential internal knowledge without retraining the model.

Key Points

Retrieve: semantic search finds relevant documents from a vector store
Augment: retrieved passages are injected into the model's context
Generate: the model responds grounded in retrieved, verified content
Solves: hallucination, knowledge cutoffs, and lack of proprietary data
Vector databases: Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, pgvector
Evaluation: faithfulness, relevance, and groundedness metrics
"RAG is the most practical way to give AI access to your organisation's knowledge without retraining a model."
Human-Centred AI Architect Pathway

Cognitive Work Design

Calibrate · Contextualise · Check · Escalate · Sustain

09

Cognitive Work Design is an original practical framework for designing AI-enabled work around human capability, not merely task automation. It asks teams to calibrate the level of AI autonomy to the consequence of a task; make objectives, evidence, and system context visible; create active review that a capable person can meaningfully perform; define routes for uncertainty and exceptions; and sustain the professional practice required to question or override the AI. The approach turns the vague idea of keeping a human in the loop into visible decisions about attention, expertise, authority, and workflow design.

Key Points

Calibrate: set the level of AI autonomy according to task consequence and reversibility
Contextualise: preserve objectives, constraints, sources, and current workflow state
Check: make verification active, informed, and supported by clear decision rights
Escalate: define triggers, routes, owners, and recovery actions for exceptions
Sustain: retain deliberate human practice in judgement-critical work
Use workload reflection to compare designs; do not treat it as a fixed capacity score
"A human in the loop is meaningful only when that person can still understand, challenge, and change the outcome."